4.7 Article

A comparative study to distinguish the vineyard of origin by NIRS using entire grapes, skins and seeds

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5842

关键词

near-infrared spectroscopy; phenolic compounds; grapes; vineyards

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [AGL2008-05569-C02, AGL2011-30254-C02]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon [GR133]
  3. Consolider project
  4. OIV
  5. Spanish MICINN for the Juan de la Cierva [JCI-2011-09201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Interest in high-quality products with a clear geographical origin is increasing. For the wine industry and market sector, identity preservation is of fundamental importance owing to the large number of geographical classifications. Nowadays, there is a growing demand for analytical methods for tracing grapes and wines. In the oenological sector, infrared spectroscopy is becoming an attractive tool allowing simultaneous measurement of several analytical parameters and enabling real-time decision making. RESULTS: Discriminant partial least squares, a supervised pattern recognition technique, was employed to discriminate between vineyards of origin using the near-infrared spectra of intact grapes, skins or seeds. In order to compare the three sample presentations, a receiver operating characteristic curve was used. The best results were obtained using intact grape seeds, with prediction rates of samples correctly classified of about 95%, although the good results obtained with entire grapes (about 93% of samples correctly classified) and the simplicity of use of the fibre optic probe could advise using entire grape presentation for comprehensive studies. CONCLUSION: The procedure reported here seems to have excellent potential for a fast and reasonably inexpensive analysis of the origin of samples. It is noted that such classification can be made at any time of ripening. This paper provides information of interest to develop new and extensive models in the future. (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据