4.7 Article

Assessment of endogenous antioxidative compounds and antioxidant activities of lager beers

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5824

关键词

beer; antioxidative compounds; antioxidant activity; Pearson correlation analysis; principal component analysis; stepwise linear regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000810]
  2. Key Technology R&D Program of Guangdong Province [2010A010500002, 2011A020102001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012ZM0069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Flavour stability is increasingly becoming the limiting factor in the shelf life of beer. Increasing the antioxidant activity of beer itself could suppress the rate of oxidative reaction and improve the flavour stability of beer. This report describes the levels of phenolic compounds, melanoidins and sulfur dioxide, and antioxidant activities of 40 lager beers. The relationships between antioxidative compounds and antioxidant activity were elucidated by multivariate analysis techniques. RESULTS: The results showed that the total phenolic content and the melanoidins content correlated well (P < 0.05) with antioxidant activity, while there was no significant correlation (P > 0.05) between total sulfur dioxide content and antioxidant activity. Satisfactory discrimination among beer samples with significantly different antioxidant activity was achieved by principal component analysis. Results from stepwise linear regression further demonstrated that different antioxidative components responsible for antioxidant activity were dependent on the assay used. The phenolic compound group is by far the most antioxidative compounds in beer and total phenolic content, melanoidins and sulfur dioxide together made a 2268% contribution to the antioxidant activities of beers. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it might be an efficient means for brewers to increase total phenolic content during brewing for improvement in flavour stability of the final beer. (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据