4.7 Article

Assessment of the effect of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5763

关键词

condensed tannins; hydrolysable tannins; in vitro fermentation; methane

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Ottawa, ON)
  3. Nutriad (Turnhout, Belgium)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Tannins added to animal diets may have a positive effect on energy and protein utilisation in the rumen. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of different sources and concentrations (20, 50, 100, 150 and 200 g kg(-1) dry matter (DM)) of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen microbial fermentation in vitro. The experiment also included a negative control with no tannins (control) and a positive control with monensin (10 mg L-1). RESULTS: In vitro gas production and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration decreased as tannin concentration increased. Addition of acacia, chestnut or valonea tannins at >= 50 g kg(-1) or quebracho tannins at >= 100 g kg(-1) resulted in a decrease (up to 40%) in methane (CH4) production compared with the control. Valonea tannins were the only tannin source that reduced (-11%) CH4 production at 50 g kg(-1) without affecting VFA concentration. Tannin treatments reduced ammonia (NH3) and branched-chain VFA concentrations, indicating a reduction in ruminal protein degradation. Monensin reduced CH4 production (-37%) and NH3 concentration (-20%) without affecting total VFA concentration. CONCLUSION: Supplying acacia, chestnut or valonea tannins at 50 g kg(-1) has the potential to reduce CH4 production and ruminal protein degradation with minimum detrimental effects on efficiency of ruminal fermentation. Copyright (C) 2012 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据