4.7 Article

Genotypic differences in zinc efficiency of Chinese maize evaluated in a pot experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 92, 期 12, 页码 2552-2559

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5672

关键词

maize; SOD activity; Zn concentration; Zn deficiency; Zn efficiency

资金

  1. 973 Project [2009 CB 118605]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-02]
  3. NSFC [30871592]
  4. Innovative Group of NSFC [31121062]
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Zinc (Zn) deficiency, a major problem limiting crop production worldwide, is common on calcareous soils of China. Using such a Zn-deficient soil supplied adequately with plant mineral nutrients, with or without Zn, 30 Chinese maize genotypes were grown for 30 days in a greenhouse pot experiment and assessed for Zn efficiency (ZE), measured as relative biomass under Zn-limiting compared with non-limiting conditions. RESULTS: Substantial variation in tolerance to low Zn nutritional status was observed within the maize genotypes. Tolerant genotypes did not show Zn deficiency symptoms at the studied early seedling growth, and there was a well-defined relationship between shoot dry matter and the ZE trait. ZE values ranged on average from 45 to 100% for shoot dry weight. Under low available soil Zn conditions, shoot and root dry weights, shoot Zn concentration and content, leaf superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, leaf area and plant height were all correlated with ZE. Shoot Zn and phosphorus (P) concentrations were negatively correlated. CONCLUSION: Three genotypes (L55 x 178, L114 x 178 and Zhongnong 99) were identified as highly Zn-efficient and three (L53 x 178, L105 x 178 and L99 x 178) as very low in ZE. This selection allows further work to evaluate ZE based on grain yield and grain Zn concentration, including field experiments likely to benefit farmers producing maize on Chinese soils low in available Zn. Copyright (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据