4.7 Article

Mothers' perceived proximity to green space is associated with TV viewing time in children: The Growing Up in Scotland study

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 46-49

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.018

关键词

Sedentary behaviour; Physical activity; Green exercise; Environment

资金

  1. Economic Social Research Council [ES/M003795/1]
  2. National Institute for Health Research's School for Public Health Research
  3. British Heart Foundation [RE/10/005/28296]
  4. ESRC [ES/M003795/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Cancer Research UK [14133] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/M003795/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The aim of this study is to investigate whether mothers' perception of distance from home to green/open spaces is associated with their child's screen time. Method. We used mother-reported data from sweep six (2010-2011) of the Growing Up in Scotland study (n = 3586 children aged 5.9 yrs) to examine associations between walking distance from home to green/open space and screen time (TV viewing time/computer use). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex and other pre-specified covariates, including sport/exercise participation, mental and general health, birth weight, parental socio-economic group (SEG) and smoking status. Results. Children living the furthest distance from green/open spaces (>20 minutes' walking distance) displayed over 2 h (95% Cl, 0.65 to 3.51) more weekly TV time than the reference category (<5 minutes' walking distance). Compared to children in the reference category, those in the >20 minute category had worse mental health (mean SDQ [Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire] score +/- SD, 7.0 +/- 4.6 vs. 8.7 +/- 6.2) and general health (% fair-poor, 4.6 vs. 8.6), and were more likely to come from lower SEG households. Conclusion. Mothers' perceived distance from home to green/open spaces was associated with child's TV time at age 5.9 years. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据