4.7 Article

Physicochemical, thermal and functional characterisation of protein isolates from Kabuli and Desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a comparative study with soy (Glycine max) and pea (Pisum sativum L.)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 1022-1031

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4277

关键词

chickpea; biotype; protein isolates; physicochemical; functional properties; soy protein

资金

  1. Saskatchewan Pulse Crop Development Board
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds are a good source of protein that has potential applications in new product formulation and fortification. The main objectives of this study were to analyse the physicochemical, thermal and functional properties of chickpea protein isolates (CPIs) and compare them with those of soy (SPI) and pea (PPI) protein isolates. RESULTS: ExtractedCPIshadmeanprotein contentsof728-853 g kg(-1) (dryweightbasis). Analysisof their deconvoluted Fourier transform infrared spectra gave secondary structure estimates of 25.6-32.7% alpha-helices, 32.5-40.4% beta-sheets, 13.8-18.9% turns and 16.3-19.2% disordered structures. CPIs from CDC Xena, among Kabuli varieties, and Myles, among Desi varieties, as well as SPI had the highest water-holding and oil absorption capacities. The emulsifying properties of Kabuli CPIs were superior to those of PPI and Desi CPIs and as good as those of SPI. The heat-induced gelation properties of CPIs showed a minimum protein concentration required to form a gel structure ranging from 100 to 140 g L-1. Denaturation temperatures and enthalpies of CPIs ranged from 89.0 to 92.0 degrees C and from 2.4 to 4.0 J g(-1) respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that most physicochemical, thermal and functional properties of CPIs compare favourably with those of SPI and are better than those of PPI. Hence CPI may be suitable as a high-quality substitute for SPI in food applications. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据