4.7 Article

Combination of 1-methylcyclopropene treatment and controlled atmosphere storage retains overall fruit quality and bioactive compounds in mango

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4653

关键词

1-MCP; fruit quality; postharvest diseases; antioxidant; controlled atmosphere storage; mango

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa under the Key International Science Capacity (KISC) Initiative
  2. South African-Argentinean collaboration programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Postharvest application of fungicide prochloraz and hot-water dip are commercially practiced to control postharvest diseases in mangoes. Owing to the increasing consumer demand for organically produced fruit, the search for natural environmentally friendly alternative products and processes has become important for the fruit industry. This study evaluated the combined effect of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) (500 nL L-1) and controlled atmosphere storage conditions (CA-1, 5% O-2 + 5% CO2 or CA-2, 3% O-2 + 8% CO2) on the maintenance of fruit quality and bioactive compounds on hot-water treated mangoes (cv. Kent) during postharvest storage. RESULTS: In comparison to the 1-MCP+CA-1 treatment, 1-MCP+CA-2 reduced the incidence of anthracnose, weight and firmness loss; delayed the skin and flesh colour development; prevented the increase of soluble solids concentration/titratable acidity ratio, ethanol and acetaldehyde content; and maintained the ascorbic acid, carotenoid, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant scavenging activity in hot-water treated mangoes. The untrained panel preferred 1-MCP+CA-2 treated fruit to the fruit subjected to other postharvest treatments adopted in this investigation. CONCLUSION: Our investigation suggests that the combined effect of 1-MCP and CA-2 storage can be recommended as an alternative treatment to replace prochloraz application for hot-water treated mangoes and can be adopted commercially for organic export markets. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据