4.7 Article

Comparative evaluation of laboratory-scale silages using standard glass jar silages or vacuum-packed model silages

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4255

关键词

laboratory-scale silage; glass jar; vacuum-packing; inoculant; perennial ryegrass; rye grain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the fermentation variables of laboratory-scale silages made in glass preserving jars (GLASS) and vacuum-packed plastic bags (Rostock model silages, ROMOS). Silages were prepared from perennial ryegrass (fresh and wilted, 151 g kg(-1) and 286 g kg(-1) dry matter (DM), respectively) and remoistened coarsely ground rye grain (650 g kg(-1) DM) either with or without the addition of a lactic acid bacteria inoculant (3 x 105 colony forming units (cfu) g(-1), LAB). Quintuplicate silos were opened on days 2, 4, 8, 49 and 90. RESULTS: Silage pH (P = 0.073), acetic acid content (P = 0.608) and ethanol content (P = 0.223) were not influenced by the ensiling method. The contents of DM (P < 0.001) and propionic acid (P = 0.008) were affected by the ensiling method, but mean differences were only marginal. In ROMOS the concentration of lactic acid was increased (P = 0.007) whereas butyric acid was produced less (P = 0.001) when compared to GLASS. This suggested slightly better ensiling conditions for ROMOS. CONCLUSIONS: ROMOS represents a reasonable alternative to glass jar silages and opens the possibility for further investigations, e. g. studying the impact of packing density as well as the quantitative and qualitative analysis of fermentation gases. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据