4.7 Article

Combined use of HMF and furosine to assess fresh honey quality

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 89, 期 8, 页码 1332-1338

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3590

关键词

HMF; furosine; quality; fresh honey

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) [AP103-007]
  2. CSIC [PIE2007801018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The quality of honey can be affected by practices such as adulteration, inadequate storage or the application of severe heat treatments. Because hydroxymehylfurfural (HMF) is an indicator of honey freshness and furosine (epsilon-2-furoylmethyl lysine) has proved to be a useful chemical indicator of the progress of the Maillard reaction in foods, the aim of this work was to assess their usefulness as indicators of fresh honey quality. The effect of heat treatment, storage and adulteration with different types of syrups on HMF and furosine content has been studied. RESULTS: In fresh honey, HMF and furosine values ranged from 0.9 to 14.6 mg kg(-1) of product and from 3.06 to 12.06 g kg(-1) of protein, respectively. Heating of honey samples with different pH (3.76 and 5.14) produced slight increases in HMF content and negligible changes were detected in furosine values. The storage of fresh honey for 2 years caused a high increase in the HMF level, reaching values above EU limits. However, furosine showed a different behavior depending on the type of honey sample. Adulteration assays using different syrups produced an increase in HMF and a decrease of furosine values by dilution effect. HMF content of adulterated honey samples with syrup of known origin did not exceed EU limits. CONCLUSION: These results show the influence of long periods of storage or adulteration, using different percentages of corn or invert sugar syrups, on HMF and furosine content of fresh honey. This seems to indicate that the combination of HMF and furosine may be useful for evaluating the quality of fresh honey. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据