4.7 Article

Phenolic compounds and fatty acid composition of organic and conventional grown pecan kernels

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 89, 期 13, 页码 2207-2213

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3708

关键词

phenolic compounds; fatty acids; pecan cultivars; organic cultivation; conventional cultivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In this study, differences in contents of phenolic compounds and fatty acids in pecan kernels of organically versus conventionally grown pecan cultivars (Cheyenne, Desirable, and Wichita) were evaluated. RESULTS: Although nine phenolic compounds (gallic acid, catechol, catechin, epicatechin, m-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, ellagic acid, caffeic acid and an ellagic acid derivative) were identified in the methanol extract (80% methanol) of defatted kernels, only three compounds (gallic acid, catechin and ellagic acid) existed in sufficient amounts to accurately quantify levels in different cultivars and to study differences in organic versus conventional cultivation. Levels of ellagic acid and catechin found in organically grown 'Desirable' were fourfold and twofold higher than in conventional samples, respectively. Furthermore, significant differences in these two compounds were also observed when comparing values between cultivars. Oil content was also significantly greater only in organically grown 'Desirable'. Oleic acid was the major fatty acid present and its content was significantly higher in organically versus conventionally grown 'Desirable' pecans, while there was no difference in levels of oleic acid in 'Wichita' and 'Cheyenne'. On the other hand, linoleic acid content was significantly less in organically versus conventionally grown 'Desirable' pecans. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results showed that the effects of cultural differences (i.e. organic versus conventional cultivation) on kernel composition largely depend on the type of pecan cultivar. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据