4.5 Review

The link between child abuse and psychopathology: A review of neurobiological and genetic research

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 151-156

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110222

关键词

-

资金

  1. ESRC [RES-061-25-0189, RES-062-23-2202]
  2. British Academy [BARDA-53229]
  3. ESRC [ES/G000131/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G000131/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Childhood abuse is associated with later psychopathology, including conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, anxiety and depression as well as a heightened risk of health and social problems. However, the neurobiological mechanisms by which childhood adversity increases vulnerability to psychopathology remain poorly understood. There is likely to be a complex interaction between environmental experiences (such as abuse) and individual differences in risk versus protective genes, which influences the neurobiological circuitry underpinning psychological and emotional development. Neuroendocrine studies indicate an association between early adversity and atypical development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stress response, which may predispose to psychiatric vulnerability in adulthood. Brain imaging research in children and adults is providing evidence of several structural and functional brain differences associated with early adversity. Structural differences have been reported in the corpus callosum, cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Functional differences have been reported in regions implicated in emotional and behavioural regulation, including the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex. These differences at the neurobiological level may represent adaptations to early experiences of heightened stress that lead to an increased risk of psychopathology. We also consider the clinical implications of future neurobiological and genetic research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据