4.6 Article

Crystallographic orientation inhomogeneity and crystal splitting in biogenic calcite

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0425

关键词

crystallography; biomineralization; bivalves; calcite; electron back-scatter diffraction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL2010-20748-CO2-01]
  2. Andalusian Consejeria de Innovacion Ciencia y Tecnologia [RNM6433]
  3. European COST Action [TD0903]
  4. FCT of the Portuguese Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia [PTDC/CTM/100468/2008, REDE/1509/RME/2005]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM/100468/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The calcitic prismatic units forming the outer shell of the bivalve Pinctada margaritifera have been analysed using scanning electron microscopy-electron back-scatter diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. In the initial stages of growth, the individual prismatic units are single crystals. Their crystalline orientation is not consistent but rather changes gradually during growth. The gradients in crystallographic orientation occur mainly in a direction parallel to the long axis of the prism, i.e. perpendicular to the shell surface and do not show preferential tilting along any of the calcite lattice axes. At a certain growth stage, gradients begin to spread and diverge, implying that the prismatic units split into several crystalline domains. In this way, a branched crystal, in which the ends of the branches are independent crystalline domains, is formed. At the nanometre scale, the material is composed of slightly misoriented domains, which are separated by planes approximately perpendicular to the c-axis. Orientational gradients and splitting processes are described in biocrystals for the first time and are undoubtedly related to the high content of intracrystalline organic molecules, although the way in which these act to induce the observed crystalline patterns is a matter of future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据