4.6 Article

Modelling the spread of Wolbachia in spatially heterogeneous environments

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
卷 9, 期 76, 页码 3045-3054

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0253

关键词

metapopulation model; symbiotic bacteria; reaction-diffusion model; mosquito-borne disease; density-dependence; travelling wave

资金

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), 'AnoPopAge' [223241]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  4. RAPIDD (Research and Policy in Infectious Disease Dynamics) programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endosymbiont Wolbachia infects a large number of insect species and is capable of rapid spread when introduced into a novel host population. The bacteria spread by manipulating their hosts' reproduction, and their dynamics are influenced by the demographic structure of the host population and patterns of contact between individuals. Reaction-diffusion models of the spatial spread of Wolbachia provide a simple analytical description of their spatial dynamics but do not account for significant details of host population dynamics. We develop a metapopulation model describing the spatial dynamics of Wolbachia in an age-structured host insect population regulated by juvenile density-dependent competition. The model produces similar dynamics to the reaction-diffusion model in the limiting case where the host's habitat quality is spatially homogeneous and Wolbachia has a small effect on host fitness. When habitat quality varies spatially, Wolbachia spread is usually much slower, and the conditions necessary for local invasion are strongly affected by immigration of insects from surrounding regions. Spread is most difficult when variation in habitat quality is spatially correlated. The results show that spatial variation in the density-dependent competition experienced by juvenile host insects can strongly affect the spread of Wolbachia infections, which is important to the use of Wolbachia to control insect vectors of human disease and other pests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据