4.6 Article

Stability in flux: community structure in dynamic networks

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
卷 8, 期 60, 页码 1031-1040

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0524

关键词

coevolutionary networks; opinion formation; modularity; dynamic equilibrium; protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D002249/1]
  2. USAID PREDICT
  3. NSF [HSD-0525216]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D002249/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/D002249/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of many biological, social and technological systems can usefully be described in terms of complex networks. Although often portrayed as fixed in time, such networks are inherently dynamic, as the edges that join nodes are cut and rewired, and nodes themselves update their states. Understanding the structure of these networks requires us to understand the dynamic processes that create, maintain and modify them. Here, we build upon existing models of coevolving networks to characterize how dynamic behaviour at the level of individual nodes generates stable aggregate behaviours. We focus particularly on the dynamics of groups of nodes formed endogenously by nodes that share similar properties (represented as node state) and demonstrate that, under certain conditions, network modularity based on state compares well with network modularity based on topology. We show that if nodes rewire their edges based on fixed node states, the network modularity reaches a stable equilibrium which we quantify analytically. Furthermore, if node state is not fixed, but can be adopted from neighbouring nodes, the distribution of group sizes reaches a dynamic equilibrium, which remains stable even as the composition and identity of the groups change. These results show that dynamic networks can maintain the stable community structure that has been observed in many social and biological systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据