4.6 Article

Geographic profiling applied to testing models of bumble-bee foraging

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
卷 6, 期 32, 页码 307-319

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0242

关键词

animal foraging behaviour; bumble-bee Bombus terrestris; criminology applications; jeopardy surface; spatial foraging strategies; theoretical foraging algorithms

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [BB/F52765X/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/F52765X/1]
  3. EPSRC [BB/F52765X/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/F52765X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F52765X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geographic profiling (GP) was originally developed as a statistical tool to help police forces prioritize lists of suspects in investigations of serial crimes. GP uses the location of related crime sites to make inferences about where the offender is most likely to live, and has been extremely successful in criminology. Here, we show how GP is applicable to experimental studies of animal foraging, using the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris. GP techniques enable us to simplify complex patterns of spatial data down to a small number of parameters (2-3) for rigorous hypothesis testing. Combining computer model simulations and experimental observation of foraging bumble-bees, we demonstrate that GP can be used to discriminate between foraging patterns resulting from (i) different hypothetical foraging algorithms and (ii) different food item (flower) densities. We also demonstrate that combining experimental and simulated data can be used to elucidate animal foraging strategies: specifically that the foraging patterns of real bumble-bees can be reliably discriminated from three out of nine hypothetical foraging algorithms. We suggest that experimental systems, like foraging bees, could be used to test and refine GP model predictions, and that GP offers a useful technique to analyse spatial animal behaviour data in both the laboratory and field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据