4.6 Article

Assessing the risk of bluetongue to UK livestock: uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a temperature-dependent model for the basic reproduction number

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
卷 5, 期 20, 页码 363-371

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1110

关键词

bluetongue; epidemiology; basic reproduction number; model; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty analysis

资金

  1. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00001320] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/I/00001320, BBS/B/00654] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/I/00001320, BBS/B/00654] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since 1998 bluetongue virus (BTV), which causes bluetongue, a non-contagious, insect-borne infectious disease of ruminants, has expanded northwards in Europe in an unprecedented series of incursions, suggesting that there is a risk to the large and valuable British livestock industry. The basic reproduction number, R-0, provides a powerful tool with which to assess the level of risk posed by a disease. In this paper, we compute R-0 for BTV in a population comprising two host species, cattle and sheep. Estimates for each parameter which influences R-0 were obtained from the published literature, using those applicable to the UK situation wherever possible. Moreover, explicit temperature dependence was included for those parameters for which it had been quantified. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses based on Latin hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation coefficients identified temperature, the probability of transmission from host to vector and the vector to host ratio as being most important in determining the magnitude of R-0. The importance of temperature reflects the fact that it influences many processes involved in the transmission of BTV and, in particular, the biting rate, the extrinsic incubation period and the vector mortality rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据