4.4 Article

Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 1010-1017

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4675

关键词

-

资金

  1. Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity
  2. NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital
  3. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V1247] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10141] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In the absence of aneuploidy or other pathogenic cytogenetic abnormality, fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT3.5mm) and/or other sonographic abnormalities have a greater incidence of genetic syndromes, but defining the underlying pathology can be challenging. Here, we investigate the value of whole exome sequencing in fetuses with sonographic abnormalities but normal microarray analysis. Method: Whole exome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from chorionic villi or amniocytes in 24 fetuses with unexplained ultrasound findings. In the first 14 cases sequencing was initially performed on fetal DNA only. For the remaining 10, the trio of fetus, mother and father was sequenced simultaneously. Results: In 21% (5/24) cases, exome sequencing provided definitive diagnoses (Milroy disease, hypophosphatasia, achondrogenesis type 2, Freeman-Sheldon syndrome and Baraitser-Winter Syndrome). In a further case, a plausible diagnosis of orofaciodigital syndrome type 6 was made. In two others, a single mutation in an autosomal recessive gene was identified, but incomplete sequencing coverage precluded exclusion of the presence of a second mutation. Conclusion: Whole exome sequencing improves prenatal diagnosis in euploid fetuses with abnormal ultrasound scans. In order to expedite interpretation of results, trio sequencing should be employed, but interpretation can still be compromised by incomplete coverage of relevant genes. (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据