4.2 Article

BAG3 mutations: another cause of giant axonal neuropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 210-216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2012.00409.x

关键词

BAG3; Bcl-2 associated athanogene; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; giant axons; myofibrillar myopathy

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  2. NINDS/ORD [1U54NS065712-01]
  3. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres
  4. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign
  5. Great Ormond Street Children's Charity
  6. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in Bcl-2 associated athanogene-3 (BAG3) are a rare cause of myofibrillar myopathy, characterised by rapidly progressive proximal and axial myopathy, cardiomyopathy and respiratory compromise. Neuropathy has been documented neurophysiologically in previously reported cases of BAG3-associated myofibrillar myopathy and in some cases giant axons were observed on nerve biopsies; however, neuropathy was not thought to be a dominant feature of the disease. In the context of inherited neuropathy, giant axons are typically associated with autosomal recessive giant axonal neuropathy caused by gigaxonin mutations but have also been reported in association with NEFL- and SH3TC2-associated Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Here, we describe four patients with heterozygous BAG3 mutations with clinical evidence of a sensorimotor neuropathy, with predominantly axonal features on neurophysiology. Three patients presented with a significant neuropathy. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in one patient revealed mild to moderate atrophy without prominent selectivity. Examination of sural nerve biopsies in two patients demonstrated giant axons. This report confirms the association of giant axonal neuropathy with BAG3-associated myofibrillar myopathy, and highlights that neuropathy may be a significant feature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据