4.5 Article

A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for facility dispersion under conditions of spatial uncertainty

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
卷 65, 期 7, 页码 1133-1142

出版社

PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2013.58

关键词

spatial uncertainty; dispersion; evolutionary algorithm; anti-covering location problem

资金

  1. National Science Foundation under [0924001, 0922737]
  2. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0924001, 0922737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Avoiding concentration or saturation of activities is fundamental in many environmental and urban planning contexts. Examples include dispersing retail and restaurant outlets, sensitivity to impacts in forest utilization, spatial equity of waste disposal, ensuring public safety associated with noxious facilities, and strategic placement of military resources, among others. Dispersion models have been widely applied to ensure spatial separation between activities or facilities. However, existing approaches rely on deterministic approaches that ignore issues of spatial data uncertainty, which could lead to poor decision making. To address data uncertainty issues in dispersion modelling, a multi-objective approach that explicitly accounts for spatial uncertainty is proposed, enabling the impacts of uncertainty to be evaluated with statistical confidence. Owing to the integration of spatial uncertainty, this dispersion model is more complex and computationally challenging to solve. In this paper we develop a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to address the computational challenges posed. The proposed heuristic incorporates problem-specific spatial knowledge to significantly enhance the capability of the evolutionary algorithm for solving this problem. Empirical results demonstrate the performance superiority of the developed approach in supporting facility and service planning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据