4.7 Article

Material port fractal of fragmentation of waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) by high-voltage pulse

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 219-226

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.006

关键词

WPCBs; High-voltage pulse; Fragmentation; Fractal mechanism; Complexity level

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovative Research Group [51221462]
  2. National Fundamental Research and Development Program (973 Program) [2012CB214904]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51134022, 51174203, 51304196]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120095130001]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK2012136 and BK20130196]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531430]
  7. Research and Innovation Project for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province, China [XYLX_1407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crushing is the key to recycling waste circuit boards, the precondition of separation. Crushing the metal and nonmetal components of a circuit board allows the separation of the nonmetal components. As the number of electrical pulses rises, the number of particles bigger than 2 mm decreases, and the number of particles smaller than 2 mm increases. The same happens when the number of pulses is invariant but the voltage is increasing. Particles smaller than 2 mm do not allow the possibility of secondary crushing. We propose a model to establish the pulse operational conditions for achieving the optimal rate of copper content distribution (-1.5 + 0.5 mm). Based on fractal theory and particle morphology, a program for calculating the fractal dimensions of WPCB ports is compiled. It is thought that the fractal dimension is related to the complexity of the fractures of the materials and the particle shapes. The more complex the fractures or particle shapes, the bigger is the calculated fractal dimension. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据