4.5 Article

Clot length does not impact outcome following thrombectomy

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 91-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.09.032

关键词

Stroke; Thrombectomy; Clot; Outcome

资金

  1. Peritz and Chantal Scheinberg Cerebrovascular Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Clot length was associated with outcome after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in patients with stroke secondary to emergent large vessel occlusions (ELVO) but data regarding the influence of clot length on outcome after thrombectomy is lacking. Patients and methods: Prospectively accrued data on consecutive patients with ELVO treated with thrombectomy was analyzed. Data on demographics, risk factors, stroke severity, survival and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was collected. Procedural details including clot length measured on the pre-thrombectomy digital subtraction angiograms in multiple projections were collected. Functional outcome was determined with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days post stroke and mRS <= 2 was considered as favorable outcome. Results: Data was collected for 94 patients that fulfilled entry criteria. On univariate analysis clot length did not differ between patients with favorable or unfavorable outcomes. Clot length also did not influence the rates of sICH or mortality. On multivariate logistic regression age and stroke severity remained significant modifiers for favorable outcome. In a second regression model age, poor collaterals, the number of passes needed for re canalization and the magnitude of change in neurological deficits between presentation and discharge remained significant modifiers of outcomes. However, clot length had no effect on outcome in both models. Conclusions: In patients undergoing thrombectomy for ELVO, clot length has no effect on functional outcomes, mortality or sICH. Therefore, patients with ELVO should not be excluded from thrombectomy based on lot length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据