4.5 Article

Delayed auditory feedback simulates features of nonfluent primary progressive aphasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 347, 期 1-2, 页码 345-348

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.039

关键词

Delayed auditory feedback; Altered auditory feedback; Dementia; Progressive aphasia; Language; Dorsal pathway

资金

  1. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres [CBRC 161]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/75710/2011]
  3. Alzheimer Research UK [ART-PhD2011-10]
  4. MRC [MR/J011274/1]
  5. Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Fellowship [091673/Z/10/Z]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/75710/2011] Funding Source: FCT
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J011274/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2012-18-010] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [MR/J011274/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathophysiology of nonfluent primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) remains poorly understood. Here, we compared quantitatively speech parameters in patients with nfvPPA versus healthy older individuals under altered auditory feedback, which has been shown to modulate normal speech output. Patients (n = 15) and healthy volunteers (n = 17) were recorded while reading aloud under delayed auditory feedback [DAF] with latency 0,50 or 200 ms and under DAF at 200 ms plus 0.5 octave upward pitch shift. DAF in healthy older individuals was associated with reduced speech rate and emergence of speech sound errors, particularly at latency 200 ms. Up to a third of the healthy older group under DAF showed speech slowing and frequency of speech sound errors within the range of the nfvPPA cohort Our findings suggest that (in addition to any anterior, primary language output disorder) these key features of nfvPPA may reflect distorted speech input signal processing, as simulated by DAF. DAF may constitute a novel candidate pathophysiological model of posterior dorsal cortical language pathway dysfunction in nfvPPA. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据