期刊
POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 260-268出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.011
关键词
Circulating fluidized bed; Two-fluid model; Wall boundary condition; Particle particle restitution coefficient; Solid viscosity
资金
- Korea Institute of Energy Research (ICIER) [B4-2433-02]
- National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [B4-2433] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
A two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulation of gas-solids flow in a circulating fluidized bed riser was performed based on the Two-Fluid Model (TFM). In this model, the kinetic theory of granular flows (KTGF) was used to solve gas-solids flow behavior. Despite several published studies, the selection of proper wall boundary conditions (BC) and the appropriate closure model to simulate riser flow remains inconclusive. In this study, a number of simulations were performed to understand the influence of the wall boundary condition, solid shear viscosity model and particle-particle restitution coefficient. At first, we systematically evaluated the influence of the combined effect of the specularity and particle-wall restitution coefficients based on Johnson and Jackson [1] BC. The key point we observed was that the effect of high specularity coefficient (phi = 0.001) was less at low particle-wall restitution coefficients (e(w) = 0.8, 0.9) on the axial solid holdup profile. At lower specularity coefficient (phi = 0.00001 & 0.0001) value, different particle-wall restitution coefficients (e(w) = 0.8, 0.9, 0.99) did not show any significant effect. Moreover, the effect of the elasticity of particle collisions showed that the low particle-particle restitution coefficients gave good quantitative agreement. The effects of solid shear viscosity models on flow predictions were investigated under different solid circulation rates (G(s) = 39.14 kg/m(2) s, 51.05 kg/m(2) s, 73.21 kg/m(2) s). Both Syamlal et al. [2] and Gidaspow [3] models gave good qualitative agreement with the experimental results. The Syamlal et al. solid viscosity model demonstrated fairly consistent results in the dilute region, whereas transition from lower to higher solid holdup was reasonably well predicted by the Gidaspow model. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据