4.5 Article

OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24-week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 331, 期 1-2, 页码 48-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.003

关键词

Medication overuse; Chronic migraine; Botulinum toxin type A; OnabotulinumtoxinA; Prophylactic treatment; Health-related quality of life

资金

  1. Allergan, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute headache medication overuse (MO) is common in patients with chronic migraine (CM). We evaluated safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA as preventive treatment of headache in CM patients with baseline MO (CM + MO) in a planned secondary analysis from two similarly designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, Phase III trials. Patients were randomized to treatment groups (155-195 U of onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo) using MO (patient-reported and diary-captured frequency of intake) as a stratifying variable. Of 1384 patients, 65.3% (n = 904) met MO criteria (onabotulinumtoxinA: n = 445, placebo: n = 459). For the CM + MO subgroup at Week 24, statistically significant between-treatment group mean changes from baseline favoring onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo were observed for headache days (primary endpoint: -8.2 vs. -6.2; p < 0.001) and other secondary endpoints: frequencies of migraine days (p < 0.001), moderate/severe headache days (p < 0.001), cumulative headache hours on headache days (p < 0.001), headache episodes (p = 0.028), and migraine episodes (p = 0.018) and the percentage of patients with severe Headache Impact Test-6 category (p < 0.001). At Week 24, change from baseline in frequency of acute headache medication intakes (secondary endpoint) was not statistically significant (p = 0.210) between groups, except for triptan intakes (p < 0.001), where the onabotulinumtoxinA-treated group was favored. OnabotulinumtoxinA was effective and well tolerated as headache prophylaxis in CM + MO patients. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据