4.7 Article

PIBM: Particulate immersed boundary method for fluid-particle interaction problems

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 1-13

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.11.025

关键词

LBM; Particulate-IBM; DEM; Fluid-particle interaction

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [ENE2010-17801]
  2. FI-AGAUR, Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca (SUR) del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement (ECO) de la Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. European Social Fund
  4. Ramon y Cajal, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [RYC-2012-11996]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that the number of particles should be scaled up to enable industrial scale simulation. The calculations are more computationally intensive when the motion of the surrounding fluid is considered. Besides the advances in computer hardware and numerical algorithms, the coupling scheme also plays an important role on the computational efficiency. In this study, a particulate immersed boundary method (PIBM) for simulating the fluid-particle multiphase flow was presented and assessed in both two- and three-dimensional applications. The idea behind PIBM derives from the conventional momentum exchange-based Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) by treating each Lagrangian point as a solid particle. This treatment enables Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) to be coupled with fine particles residing within a particular grid cell. Compared with the conventional IBM, dozens of times speedup in two-dimensional simulation and hundreds of times in three-dimensional simulation can be expected under the same particle and mesh number. Numerical simulations of particle sedimentation in Newtonian flows were canducted based on a combined LBM-PIBM-Discrete Element Method (DEM) scheme, showing that the PIBM can capture the feature of particulate flows in fluid and is indeed a promising scheme for the solution of the fluid-particle interaction problems. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据