4.5 Article

Disease duration-related differences in non-motor symptoms: A study of 616 Chinese Parkinson's disease patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 330, 期 1-2, 页码 32-37

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.03.022

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Non-motor symptoms; Disease duration; Non-motor symptoms scale; Neurodegenerative disease; Disease progression

资金

  1. National Science Fund of China [30973149]
  2. Science and Technology Bureau Fund of Sichuan Province [2010SZ0069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differences in non-motor symptoms (NMS) along with the duration of Parkinson's disease (PD) in Chinese populations remain largely unknown. A total of 616 PD patients consisting of 189 patients with disease duration of less than 2 years, 239 patients with duration between 2 and 5 years, 122 patients with duration between 5 and 10 years, and 66 patients with duration more than 10 years from Southwest China were studied. Each patient was assessed using the non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS). The mean affected number of NMS was 8.8 +/- 5.8, and the mean total NMSS score was 36.3 +/- 33.2. The mean affected number of NMS and the mean total NMSS score increased with the disease progression. The following symptoms became more common and severe with the disease duration: falls due to fainting, fatigue, difficulty falling asleep, restless legs, perceptual problem/hallucination domain (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, and double vision), gastrointestinal domain (i.e., dribbling saliva, swallowing, and constipation), urinary domain (i.e., urgency, frequency, and nocturia), and miscellaneous domain (i.e., excessive sweating). However, some symptoms such as mood/apathy pleasure, sexual dysfunction, and others remained stable. NMS are prevalent in all disease duration of the Chinese PD patients. Although the mean affected number of NMS and NMMS score increased with the disease duration, NMS progression is symptom specific. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据