4.5 Article

Dementia is associated with Insulin Resistance in patients with Parkinson's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 315, 期 1-2, 页码 39-43

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.12.008

关键词

Insulin Resistance; 2 h-OGTT; Parkinson Disease; Dementia; Diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder involving the basal ganglia. Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus is an important risk factor for Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. However, the association between Parkinson's disease and Diabetes Mellitus is controversial. Objective: To investigate glucose metabolism abnormalities in 110 Parkinson's disease patients with and without dementia. Subjects and Methods: We evaluated Insulin Resistance, glucose and insulin levels after a 2-h-oral-glucose-tolerance-test in 53 Parkinson's disease with dementia and 57 with Parkinson's disease without dementia, with normal fasting glucose. Results: BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose and insulin values, HbA1c, triglycerides, blood lipid profile, depression rating, educational levels, levodopa-dosage and antipsychotic use were similar in both groups. Disease duration and motor impairment were higher in patients with Parkinson's disease and dementia group. After 2-h-oral-glucose-tolerance-test, the prevalence of glucose metabolism abnormalities was significantly higher in group with Parkinson's disease and dementia group (p = 0.03). The insulin resistance was present in 62% patients with Parkinson's disease with dementia, of whom 30% had also impaired glucose tolerance, 5,6% newly diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus and 26% only Insulin Resistance. These percentages were significantly higher in group with Parkinson's disease and dementia, also after adjustment for disease duration and motor disability. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PD patients with dementia are two times more likely to have insulin resistance than patients with PD (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据