4.7 Article

Effect of PLA/PCL/cinnamaldehyde antimicrobial packaging on physicochemical and microbial quality of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus)

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 73-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.018

关键词

Poly(lactic acid); Poly(epsilon-caprolactone); Cinnamaldehyde; Button mushroom; Physicochemical quality; Microbial quality

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31160198, 31360417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of biobased poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) blend films with different cinnamaldehyde contents (0, 3, and 9 wt%) on the physicochemical and microbial quality of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) stored at 4 +/- 1 degrees C for 16 days was investigated. The low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film was used as the control. The microbial levels and physicochemical properties such as weight loss, firmness, total soluble solids, O-2 and CO2 concentrations, microbiological quality, color, and sensory quality of mushrooms were measured. Although the highest weight loss (3.08%) was observed in the PLARCL/C9 treatment at the end of storage, it was still lower than 5%. Mushrooms packaged in the PLA/PCL/cinnamaldehyde blend films were significantly (p < 0.05) firmer than those packaged in the control and PLA/PCL film. The CO2 level inside the PLA/PCL film with cinnamaldehyde was lower than those inside the control and PLA/PCL film, but the O-2 level was similar in all packages. The PLA/PCL/C9 film was more effective in reducing microbial counts and preserving the color of mushrooms than the other three films. The overall acceptability of mushrooms packaged in the PLA/PCL/C9 film still remained good and within limit of marketability after 12 d of storage. The results suggested that the PLA/PCL/C9 film with higher water vapor permeability could be used to maintain the quality of fresh button mushroom and extend its postharvest life. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据