4.7 Article

Nonlinear analysis of microstructure-dependent functionally graded piezoelectric material actuators

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.09.008

关键词

Couple stress theory; Functionally graded piezoelectric material; Finite element analysis; Thermo-mechanical response; Timoshenko beam theory; Von Karman nonlinearity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1030836]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1030836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, a nonlinear thermo-electro-mechanical response of functionally graded piezoelectric material (FGPM) actuators is investigated. The theoretical formulation is based on the Timoshenko beam theory with the von Karman nonlinearity (in the form of midplane stretching), and a microstructural length scale is incorporated by means of the modified couple stress theory. A power-law distribution of thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties through beam thickness (or height) is assumed. The governing equations are derived using the principle of virtual displacements. A displacement finite element model of the theory is developed, and the resulting system of nonlinear algebraic equations is solved with the help of Newton's iteration method. Numerical results are presented for transverse deflection as a function of load parameters and out-of-plane boundary conditions. The parametric effects of microstructural length scale parameter, power-law index of the material distribution across the thickness, boundary conditions, beam geometry, and applied actuator voltage on the beam response are investigated through various numerical examples. The results reveal the existence of bifurcation (or critical states) for certain types of in-plane loads. For other load types, including out-ofplane loads, the beam undergoes a unique and stable deflection path that does not contain any critical point. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据