4.6 Article

Osteocyte differentiation is regulated by extracellular matrix stiffness and intercellular separation

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.06.013

关键词

Bone; Osteoblast; Osteocyte; Cellular differentiation; Extracellular mechanical environment

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [258992]
  2. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institute of Health (NIH) [AR041210, AR057139]
  3. NUI Galway College of Engineering and Informatics Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteocytes are terminally differentiated bone cells, derived from osteoblasts, which are vital for the regulation of bone formation and resorption. ECM stiffness and cell seeding density have been shown to regulate osteoblast differentiation, but the precise cues that initiate osteoblast osteocyte differentiation are not yet understood. In this study, we cultured MC3T3-E1 cells on (A) substrates of different chemical compositions and stiffnesses, as well as, (B) substrates of identical chemical composition but different stiffnesses. The effect of cell separation was investigated by seeding cells at different densities on each substrate. Cells were evaluated for morphology, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), matrix mineralisation, osteoblast specific genes (Type 1 collagen, Osteoblast specific factor (OSF-2)), and osteocyte specific proteins (dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP-1), sclerostin (Sost)). We found that osteocyte differentiation (confirmed by dendritic morphology, mineralisation, reduced ALP, Col type 1 and OSF-2 and increased DMP-1 and Sost expression) was significantly increased on soft collagen based substrates, at low seeding densities compared to cells on stiffer substrates or those plated at high seeding density. We propose that the physical nature of the ECM and the necessity for cells to establish a communication network contribute substantially to a concerted shift toward an osteocyte-like phenotype by osteoblasts in vitro. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据