4.6 Article

Ultimate stress and age-dependent deformation characteristics of the iliotibial tract

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.025

关键词

Fresh specimens; Iliotibial tract; Partial plastination; Regression analysis; Secant stiffness; Ultimate stress; Young donors; Young's modulus of elasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: To understand biomechanics of ligaments and tendons data on their material properties are necessary. The iliotibial tract is a suitable model for virtual pelvic or lower extremity ligaments due to its parallel fibers, which facilitates biomechanical testing. Here, we determined Young's modulus (YM) as secant stiffness between defined limits of the iliotibial tract and correlated the data to ultimate stress (US) of the specimens and to age, gender and body weight of the body donors. Materials and methods: Thirty eight specimens from 12 iliotibial tracts of 10 young donors (mean age 31.2 +/- 9.1 years) were investigated biomechanically. After preconditioning, YM were determined in the ranges of 0-4 and 4-11 N/mm(2) of applied stress and from 4 N/mm(2) of applied stress to US. Results: YM of the specimens were 84.7 +/- 30.2 (0-4 N/mm(2)), 335.4 +/- 101.9 (4-11 N/mm(2)), and 369.1 +/- 191.5 (4 N/mm(2) to US) N/mm(2), respectively. The mean US was 35.8 +/- 16.4 N/mm(2). YM and US correlated closely in the ranges of 4-11 N/mm(2) (r=0.95) and 4 N/mm(2) to US (r=0.91). YM did not correlate to age, body weight or gender within these young donors. Concerning tissue behavior a decrease of YM, i.e. weakening, is more common than an increase of YM, i.e. stiffening, before specimen failure. Overall, YM of specimens from young donors were significantly lower compared to those of old donors. Discussion and conclusions: This is the first study providing age-dependent nonlinear stiffness properties of the iliotibial tract. YM is significantly lower in young than in old donors and is thus a subject of alteration during life time. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据