4.1 Article

Stability characteristics of gallium-doped zinc-tin-oxide thin-film transistors fabricated using a sol-gel method

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 1176-1182

出版社

KOREAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.62.1176

关键词

ZnSnO; Ga; Sol-gel; TFTs

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Korea [10041808, 10041947]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Korea, under the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Workforce Development Program in Strategic Technology
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012011424]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10041947] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the incorporation of Ga into zinc-tin-oxide (ZTO) thin-film transistors (TFTs) and assessed the TFTs' electrical and stability properties. The Ga-doped ZTO (ZTO:Ga) thin films were deposited on thermally oxidized silicon substrates by using a sol-gel technique. The Ga contents were varied from 1 to 20 atomic percent (at.%) while the Zn:Sn ratio was maintained at 1:1. The dependence of the ZTO:Ga thin films' structural properties on the Ga content was analyzed using Xray diffraction (XRD) spectra, scanning probe microscopy (SPM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and UV-visible spectrophotometry. The field effect mobilities and the I (on) /I (off) ratios of the ZTO:Ga-TFTs were between 0.68 and 2.95 cm(2)Vs(-1)s(-1) and similar to 10(4) and similar to 10(6), respectively. At low Ga contents, the (< 10-at.%) TFTs displayed similar TFT parameters, but the 20-at.%-Ga TFT showed improved mobility and stability characteristics. Moreover, the 20-at.%-Ga thin film had a smoother surface and increased crystallinity than the low Ga-content samples did.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据