4.1 Article

Effect of additives on the structure, nanomorphology and efficiency of PCPDTBT: PC71BM solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 464-469

出版社

KOREAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.61.464

关键词

Organic photovoltaic device; Bulk heterojunction; PCPDTBT; PC71BM; Power conversion efficiency

资金

  1. Chubu Science and Technology Center
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology Private University Project [S1001033]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through target-driven RD [AS232Z02610B]
  4. Aichi Institute of Technology
  5. Nippon Denwa Shisetsu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effect of additives on the morphology of a poly[2,6-(4,4-bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-4H-cyclopenta[2,1-b;3,4-b']dithiophene)-alt-4,7-(2,1,3-benzothiadiazole)] (PCPDTBT):(6,6)-phenyl C-71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) blended onto a surface of poly (3, 4-ethylendioxythiophene): poly(styrensulfonate)(PEDOT:PSS) to form photoactive films. Films of PCPDTBT: PC71-BM bulk heterojunctions were prepared by spin-coating from a solution in chlorobenzene (CB) and were processed with and without the addition of 2%, 4%, and 6 vol% 1-chloro naphthalene (CN) or 1, 8-octanedithiol (ODT) as additives. For all samples, the PCPDTBT:PC71BM molar ratio was 1:2 (wt%), and the additives in 1 ml were prepared with a concentration of 30 mg of PCPDTBT:PC71BM. Optical absorption spectroscopy measurements of the films indicated shifts in the absorption peaks in the range from 500-800 nm which was attributed to PCPDTBT. XRay diffraction (XRD) was used to investigate the nature of the molecular stacking in the polymer thin films. Topographic images which were obtained by using an atomic force microscope, of the PCPDTBT:PC71BM layers with 2 vol% ODT additive, were found to have the highest surface roughness. The best performing device shows a power conversion efficiency of 2.15% for a 2-vol% ODT additive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据