4.2 Article

Supramolecular Structure of Calcium(II) Based on Chelidamic Acid: An Agreement Between Theoretical and Experimental Studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 992-1005

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03246555

关键词

Calcium(II); Crystal structure; Hydrogen bonds; Coordination compounds; DFT; Solution studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel supramolecular structure of an s-Block metal ion, Ca(II) atom, formulated as (PnH(2))(2)[Ca-2(H2O)(2)(Hhypydc)(4)]center dot 4H(2)O (1), was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, H-1 and C-13 NMR spectroscopies and single crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 1 is a member of a large family of supramolecular metallic compounds recently derived from a proton transfer ion pair, (pnH(2))(Hhypydc), where pn is propane-1,3-diamine and (Hhypydc)(2-) is 4-hydroxypyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate ion. Based upon the molecular structure analysis of the binuclear anionic complex, the coordination environment around each Ca(H) atom is pentagonal bipyramidal with seven-coordination number. The strong hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups of two neighboring anionic complexes produce the nice tape as X-like supramolecular structure. Optimization was carried out using two standard basis sets of 6-31G (d,p) for the single anionic complex (S) and LanL2MB basis set for the double anionic complexes (D) which de-scribe-the electrons of all atoms. As an interesting finding from our theoretical Calculations, when we reoptimized the double complexes in the presence of strong hydrogen bond interaction between two hydroxyl groups, O3-H3A center dot center dot center dot 08(ii) (ii = x-1, y, z-1), it was revealed that the parallel position of ligands to each other was exactly like that of the solid state. The complexation reaction of H(3)hypydc with Ca2+ in aqueous solution was investigated by potentiometric pH titrations, the equilibrium constants and species distribution in various pHs. The for major complexes formed are described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据