4.0 Article

Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation use and evolution of hydrochemical facies in the Markanda river basin, northwestern India

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 189-198

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-012-0024-0

关键词

Groundwater quality; Hydrochemical parameters; Hydrochemical facies; Chebotarev sequence; Markanda basin; Northwestern India

资金

  1. Dept. of Geology, University of Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Markanda river basin occupying an area of about 1547 km(2) is a part of the alluvial deposits of the Indo- Gangetic plain near the Himalayan foothills in the northwest India. The region is associated with active agricultural activities and makes significant contribution to the country's agricultural products. Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation use and hydrochemical evolution of groundwater has been studied. Hydrochemical analysis has been carried out based on concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, SO4 (2-), CO3 (2-) and HCO3 (-). Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), percent sodium (%Na), permeability index (PI) and Trilinear diagram have been studied to evaluate suitability of irrigation use. Hydrochemical evolution has been analyzed based on the Chebotarev sequence and expanded Durov diagram. SAR, %Na and PI results indicate that the groundwater in the basin is suitable for irrigation use. Analysis on Trilinear diagram reveals that hydrochemical facies are dominated by HCO3 (-)- Ca2+- Mg2+ facies indicating that the groundwater is associated with recharge waters percolating through sandstone and limestone rocks which are exposed in the northern part of the basin. Studies based on Chebotarev anion sequence and expanded Durov diagram indicate that the evolution of groundwater belongs to initial to intermediate stage indicating fresh water quality. Thus, the present work reveals that groundwater in the Markanda basin is of good quality and is suitable for all uses including interbasin water transfer in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据