4.7 Article

Flame-retardant mechanism of a novel polymeric intumescent flame retardant containing caged bicyclic phosphate for polypropylene

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 22-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.009

关键词

Polymeric intumescent flame retardant; Polypropylene; Caged bicyclic phosphate; Single-component; Flame-retardant mechanism

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013040015249]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560660]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013ZB0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel polymeric intumescent flame retardant, named poly(ethanediamine-1,3,5-triazine-o-bicyclic pentaerythritol phosphate) (PETBP), was synthesized and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), solid-state C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (C-13 NMR), P-31 NMR and elemental analysis (EA). The effects of PETBP on the flame retardancy and thermostability of polypropylene (PP) were investigated by limiting oxygen index (LOI), vertical burning test (UL-94V), cone calorimetric test (CCT), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and TG-FTIR, respectively. The results showed that PETBP could significantly improve the flame retardancy and thermostability of PP. When the content of PETBP was 25.0 wt%, the PP/PETBP mixture could achieve a LOI value of 29.5% and a UL-94 V-0 rating, and its peak heat release rate (PHRR), total heat release (THR), average mass loss rate (av-MLR), smoke production rate (SPR) and total smoke production (TSP) were considerably decreased. The flame-retardant mechanism of PETBP was investigated by TGA, FTIR, TG-FTIR and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDXS). The results revealed that during the combustion PETBP could quench the free radicals of PP chain scission, and form a continuous and compact intumescent char on the substrate, thus effectively retard the degradation and combustion of PP. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据