4.0 Article

Wavelength-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometric determination of tantalum in columbite-tantalite using TaKα and an LiF 420 analysing crystal

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 171-174

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-010-0091-z

关键词

X-ray spectrometry; WDXRFS; Columbite-tantalite; TaK alpha radiation; LiF 420 analysing crystal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a simple, accurate, precise, and rapid method for determining the high atomic number (Z) major-element, tantalum (Z = 73), in the rare mineral, columbite [(Fe,Mn) (Nb,Ta)(2)O(6)] - tantalite [(Fe,Mn) (Ta,Nb)(2)O(6)], by wavelength-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometry (WDXRFS). The other major-element in columbite-tantalite is the lower atomic number niobium (Z = 41). The method uses the characteristic radiation, TaK alpha, and an LiF 420 analysing crystal, to overcome the problems associated with the serious x-ray spectral-line interference of the secondorder NbK alpha and NbK beta with the first-order TaL alpha 1 and TaL beta 1 respectively. Samples of columbite-tantalite ground to minus 300 mesh are blended with cellulose in the proportion of 1:1, and pressed powder-pellets are made from 1-g aliquots, with boric acid as a backing. The analytical standards consist of chemically analysed columbite-tantalite containing 5 to 80% by weight of Ta(2)O(5). The instrumental parameters include a rhodium x-ray tube (operating voltage = 100 kV; current = 10 mA), air path, fine collimator (150 mu m), and scintillation counter. The counting involves fixed time with three readings of 20s each on the peak and three readings of 20s each on one background. The accuracy achieved is excellent (within 1.6 to 2.2%), as is the precision (within 0.4 to 2.4%). The time taken for determining Ta(2)O(5) in a batch of twentyfour samples of columbite-tantalite, for a replication of four analyses per sample, by one operator using a manual WDXRF spectrometer, is only five hours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据