4.3 Review

Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: Review and Perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 108, 期 2, 页码 87-101

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60039-5

关键词

cartilage repair

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Articular cartilage defects heal poorly and lead to catastrophic degenerative arthritis. Clinical experience has indicated that no existing medication substantially promotes the healing process and the cartilage defect requires surgical replacement, preferably with an autograft. However, there is a shortage of articular cartilage that can be donated for autografting. A review of previous unsuccessful experiences reveals the reason for the current strategy to graft cartilage defects with regenerated cartilage. Autologous cartilage regeneration is a cell-based therapy in which autogenous chondrocytes or other chondrogenic cells are cultured to constitute cartilaginous tissue according to the principles of tissue engineering. Current studies are concentrating on improving such techniques from the three elements of tissue engineering, namely the cells, biomaterial scaffolds, and culture conditions. Some models of articular cartilage regeneration have yielded good repair of cartilage defects, in animal models and clinical settings, but the overall results suggest that there is room for improvement of this technique before its routine clinical application. Autologous cartilage regeneration remains the mainstay for repairing articular cartilage defects but more studies are required to optimize the efficacy of regeneration. A more abundant supply of more stable cells, i.e. capable of maintaining the phenotype of chondrogenesis, has to be identified. Porous scaffolds of biocompatible, biodegradable materials that maintain and support the presentation of the chondrogenic cells need to be fabricated. If the cells are not implanted early to allow their in vivo constitution of cartilage, a suitable in vitro cultivation method has to be devised for a consistent yield of regenerative cartilage. [J Formos Med Assoc 2009; 108(2):87-101]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据