4.7 Article

Synthesis of Core-Shell Particles Based on Hyperbranced Polyester and Zirconium Slag Nanoparticles and Its Influence on the Impact Resistance of Epoxy Resin Thermosets

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 441-451

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.23602

关键词

-

资金

  1. Important National Science and Technology Specific Projects [2012ZX04010032]
  2. Production, Education, and Research Prospective Project of Jiangsu Province [BY2014108-18]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202211, 51402251]
  4. Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [BK20130428]
  5. National Spark Program of China [2013GA690231]
  6. Research Fund of Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province [AE201111]
  7. Graduate Student Research and Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0203]
  8. Academic Scientific Research Industrialization Projects of Jiangsu Province [JHB2011-53]
  9. Research Fund for Wall Materials Innovation of Jiangsu Economic and Information Technology Commission [2013-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Core-shell particles (CSPs) were prepared by hyper-branched polyesters (HBPs), which synthesized by the polycondensation of succinic anhydride and diethanolamine, grafted on zirconium slag nanoparticles (ZSN), a kind of solid waste in zirconium industry. The CSPs were characterized by attenuated total internal reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), high resolution transmission electron micrographs (HRTEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Then the effect of CSPs on impact enhancement of epoxy resin thermosets modified by HBP with different kinds of functional terminal groups, such as hydroxyl group, epoxide group, and amino group, was studied. The results indicated that the addition of CSPs resulted to a strong interfacial adhesion and thus improve the impact resistance of epoxy resin thermosets. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:441-451, 2017. (C) 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据