4.6 Article

Treatment of paediatric scalp psoriasis with calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate scalp formulation: effectiveness, safety and influence on children's quality of life in daily practice

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12789

关键词

-

资金

  1. department of dermatology of Radboud university medical center in Nijmegen
  2. Netherlands from Merck-Serono
  3. Wyeth
  4. Abbott
  5. Pfizer
  6. Janssen
  7. MSD
  8. Abbvie
  9. Astellas
  10. Leo Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundEvidence on efficacy and safety of topical treatments for paediatric scalp psoriasis is lacking. ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate scalp formulation for paediatric scalp psoriasis in daily clinical practice. The influence of this formulation on the quality of life (QoL) was assessed as well. MethodsData of children treated with the scalp formulation were extracted from a prospective observational daily clinical practice registry of children with psoriasis, called Child-Continuous Assessment of Psoriasis Treatment Use Registry. Severity was expressed by Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) and the impact on the QoL was reflected by the validated Children's Scalpdex in Psoriasis (CSP). ResultsEighty-four treatment episodes were analysed. Significant improvements of PSSI score (18.711.8 to 12.7 +/- 9.4) were demonstrated in the first 12weeks and this result was well maintained during 48weeks of follow-up. Three patients (4.1%) developed striae of the skin (arms, trunk and legs), which are possibly related to the scalp formulation. CSP scores (79.0-46.3) declined significantly after 3months. ConclusionIn a daily clinical practice cohort of children with scalp psoriasis, calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate scalp formulation was effective with a 32.1% improvement of PSSI at week 12 and a maintenance of this effect until 48weeks of follow-up, in combination with improvement of QoL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据