4.6 Article

Investigation of cytokine levels and their association with SCORAD index in adults with acute atopic dermatitis

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03800.x

关键词

atopic dermatitis; cytokines; SCORAD index; TNF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with increasing frequency over the last decades, especially in adults. Cytokines orchestrate atopic skin inflammation. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare serum levels of cytokines in adult patients with acute AD (AD1) with other groups of AD patients and controls and investigate the possible association between such cytokines and disease severity. Methods We measured cytokine levels using flow cytometry in 21 adult patients with acute AD, 12 adults with chronic AD, 10 children with acute AD and 10 healthy adults. Results Flow cytometry analysis of cytokines revealed that interleukin 10 (IL-10), IL-6, interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) and IL-4 levels were significantly decreased in AD1 group compared with controls, whereas IL-2 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) did not differ. Comparison of AD1 group with adults chronic phase group showed that IgE, eosinophil and IL-2 levels remained unaltered, whereas IL-10, IL-6, IFN-gamma, IL-4 and TNF were significantly decreased. SCORAD and IgE levels were significantly increased, IL-10, IL-6 and IFN-gamma were decreased and TNF, IL-2, IL-4 and eosinophil levels remained unchanged in AD1 group compared with children acute phase group. Within AD1 group correlation analysis revealed that IgE and TNF levels were significantly associated with AD severity. Coefficient of determination analysis revealed that TNF and IgE levels could explain 49.14% and 35.28% of the variance of SCORAD. Conclusions These data indicate that serum IgE and TNF levels correlate with AD severity and that serum cytokines are downregulated in AD1 group. Further studies are clearly needed to elucidate cytokines' role in adults with AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据