4.6 Article

Voltage-Relaxation GITT and Reverse Monte Carlo to Determine Lithium Diffusion and Distribution in TiO2 and Highly-Ordered Nanoporous Hard Carbons

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 165, 期 11, 页码 A2824-A2832

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1121811jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Missouri
  2. Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium (HyMARC) as part of the Energy Materials Network under the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office [DOE - EE0007656]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amorphous hard carbons (AHCs) and metal oxides such as TiO2 are of interest in applications for energy storage including pseudo/super-capacitors and lithium-ion batteries. We present measurements of lithium diffusion and distribution in anatase TiO2 and several ordered AHCs prepared by soft/hard-templating techniques, some with capacities > 800 mAh/g. The investigated AHCs have surface areas between 60-937 m(2)/g and pore volumes between 0.04-1.01 cc/g. Li-diffusion was measured using two complimentary techniques (1) Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (GITT), and (2) a stretched exponential to investigate the voltage-relaxation (VR) GITT curve. VR-GITT provides two parameters related to (i) the geometry through which the diffusion is occurring, and (ii) a time scale yielding the diffusion constant with knowledge of an appropriate length scale. Both methods find diffusion constants in very good agreement with each other. Most importantly, the VR-GITT fitting parameters serve as a distinctive characterization tool and are able to distinguish between AHCs with different pore geometries and synthesis techniques. Further analysis of the VR curves was performed by numerical integration of the diffusion equation and reverse Monte Carlo simulated annealing to investigate the Li density profile in both TiO2 and the carbons, and suggest that lithium may plate nanopores of AHCs. (C) 2018 The Electrochemical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据