4.6 Article

Ultra High-Precision Studies of Degradation Mechanisms in Aged LiCoO2/Graphite Li-Ion Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 161, 期 10, 页码 A1572-A1579

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0321410jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC/3M Canada Industrial Research Chair program
  2. NSERC Automotive Partnership program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust
  5. MIUR
  6. NSERC
  7. DREAMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Twenty LiCoO2/Graphite cells with ages between 0 and 12 years having different cycling histories but identical chemistry and construction were obtained from Medtronic Inc. These cells presented a unique opportunity to learn about aging mechanisms in Li-ion cells. The cells were studied using the ultra-high precision chargers (UHPC) at Dalhousie University, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and differential voltage versus capacity (dV/dQ vs Q) measurements. Even after 12 years of operation at 37 degrees C, the cells still retained 80% of their initial capacity and their coulombic efficiency was 0.99985 when measured at C/20 and 40 degrees C. The capacity loss of the aged cells could be explained by loss of lithium inventory through growth of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at the negative electrode which led to impedance increase. There is no evidence of any active material loss due to electrical disconnect in these cells suggesting the cells have excellent electrodes. A low upper cutoff voltage (4.075 V) is crucial to the long lifetime of these cells due to electrolyte oxidation reactions at the positive electrode, revealed by the UHPC experiments. Comparing similar cells that were cycled to either 4.075 or 4.175 V showed that those cycled to higher voltages under the same conditions failed significantly sooner. These results suggest that electrolyte additives that reduce electrolyte oxidation at the positive electrode, will prolong the cycle and calendar life of these Li-ion cells. (C) 2014 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据