4.7 Article

Development of a donor polymer using a B <- N unit for suitable LUMO/HOMO energy levels and improved photovoltaic performance

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 6, 期 46, 页码 8029-8035

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5py01389e

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 Project [2014CB643504]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of China [51373165, 21404099]
  3. Thousand Talents Program of China
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12010200]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials in Jilin University [sklssm201507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The LUMO/HOMO energy levels of conjugated polymers are key parameters for their applications as polymer electron donors for polymer solar cells (PSCs). The widely-used strategy to tune the LUMO/HOMO levels of polymer donors is to develop D-A type polymers based on an alternating electron-donating unit (D) and an electron-accepting unit (A). In this paper, we report a novel approach to tune the LUMO/HOMO levels of polymer donors via replacing a C-C unit by a B <- N unit for enhanced PSC device performance. The control polymer PCPDT shows the LUMO/HOMO levels of -2.71 eV/-4.98 eV, which are both much higher than those required for an ideal polymer donor. By replacing a C-C unit with a B <- N unit, the resulting polymer PBNCPDT exhibits much lower LUMO/HOMO levels of -3.23 eV/-5.20 eV. PBNCPDT also shows a narrower optical bandgap (E-g = 1.73 eV) than that (E-g = 1.85 eV) of PCPDT, which is helpful for harvesting of sunlight. Moreover, PBNCPDT with the B <- N unit is not a typical D-A type conjugated polymer because its LUMO and HOMO are both delocalized over the whole conjugated framework. As the control PSC device based on PCPDT exhibits an open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of 0.45 V and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 0.63%, the device of PBNCPDT shows much improved V-oc of 0.82 V and PCE of 3.74%. These results indicate that a B <- N unit can be used to develop polymer donors for high-performance PSC devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据