4.6 Article

Nickel Hydroxide Nanoflowers for a Nonenzymatic Electrochemical Glucose Sensor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 161, 期 10, 页码 B216-B219

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0521410jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research grant [JCYJ20120613172439451]
  2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
  3. Jiangsu Province Innovation Platform for Superiority Subject of Environmental Science and Engineering [KHK1212]
  4. Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Commission [ZDSY20120612094418467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel hydroxide nanoflowers (f-Ni(OH)(2)) were synthesized in present work. The crystal structure of as-prepared sample is beta-Ni(OH)(2) phase (JCPDS # 14-0117). A nano composite film was fabricated by dispersing nano scale f-Ni(OH)(2) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) into Nafion solution. The electrocatalytic oxidation of glucose in alkaline medium on the f-Ni(OH)(2)-CNT-Nafion composite (fNCN) modified glass carbon electrode (GCE) had been investigated. The prepared f-Ni(OH)(2)-CNT-Nafion / Glass Carbon electrode (fNCN/GCE) glucose sensor could produce large electrocatalytic oxidation current in glucose solution when the applied potential exceeds 0.32 V vs. SCE, which is much lower than the similar sensor based on Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets (s-Ni(OH)(2)) and is comparable to alpha-Ni(OH)(2) sensor. Amperometric measurements were done with different concentrations of glucose. The fNCN/GCE glucose sensor has high sensitivity and low detection limit at a potential of 0.45 V (vs. SCE). It showed a detection limit of 0.5 mu M (S/N = 3) and a sensitivity of 16.85 mu A mM(-1) (238.5 mu A mM(-1) cm(-2)) with a linear range from 0.1 to 1.1 mM. The K-m derived from Lineweaver-Burk equation is evaluated to be 4.25 mM, which is much lower than enzymatic glucose biosensor. (C) 2014 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据