4.6 Article

Reversible Intercalation of Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide Anions from an Ionic Liquid Electrolyte into Graphite for High Performance Dual-Ion Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 159, 期 11, 页码 A1755-A1765

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.011211jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03x4601A, LIB2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dual-graphite cells have been proposed as electrochemical energy storage systems using graphite as both, the anode and cathode, whereas the electrolyte cations intercalate into the negative electrode and the electrolyte anions intercalate into the positive electrode during charge. On discharge, cations and anions are released back into the electrolyte. In this contribution, we present highly promising results for dual-ion cells based on intercalation of bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide anions into a graphite cathode from an ionic liquid-based electrolyte, namely N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (Pyr(14)TFSI). As the compatibility of this ionic liquid with graphitic anodes is relatively poor, metallic lithium and lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12) are used as anode. As both cations and anions participate in the charge/discharge reaction and other anode materials than graphite are possible, we propose the name dual-ion cells for these systems. The cell performance was studied in terms of cut-off voltage, temperature, cycling stability, self-discharge and rate performance. Depending on the cut-off voltage and temperature, coulombic efficiencies of more than 99 % and specific discharge capacities exceeding 100 mAh g(-1) (based on graphite cathode weight) were achieved. Furthermore, this system provides an excellent cycling stability and capacity retention above 99 % after 500 cycles, outperforming reported organic solvent-based dual-graphite or dual-ion cells. (C) 2012 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/2.011211jes] All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据