4.6 Article

Strain Effect of Core-Shell Co@Pt/C Nanoparticle Catalyst with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity for Methanol Oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 159, 期 3, 页码 B270-B276

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.015203jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21163018]
  2. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [20110490847]
  3. South African NRF [SUR2008060900021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A surface engineering approach was adopted for the preparation of a core-shell structure of bimetallic PtCo nanoparticles to improve catalytic activity for methanol oxidation on a mass basis. Synthesis of core-shell Co@Pt nanocomposite catalysts with different Pt content was carried out by reducing platinum precursors using ethylene glycolcitrate (EG) in aqueous solution containing previously formed Co/C. Characterizations were carried out using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) and electrochemical techniques. The synthesized core-shell Co@Pt nanocomposite catalysts showed enhanced catalytic activity in the methanol oxidation reaction. The enhancement may result from favorable strain effects related to the thickness of Pt shell formed on the non-noble metal substrate. Moreover, the electrocatalytic activity was optimized by tuning shell thickness. This result confirms that changing the Pt shell thickness has a significant effect on the catalytic activities of nonnoble core-noble shell bimetallic nanoclusters. The developed surface-modification method (i.e. by fine-tuning the thickness of Pt shell on the non-noble metal substrate) has great potential application for producing highly active electrochemical catalysts for methanol oxidation on a large scale. The work thus paves the way for further investigating the strain effect in core-shell bimetallic catalysts. (C) 2012 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/2.015203jes] All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据