4.6 Article

Evaluation of Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells Based on Composite Positive Electrode for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Applications III. Effect of Thermal Excursions without Prolonged Thermal Aging

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 A191-A199

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.063301jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office (EERE) [DE-AC07-05ID14517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the behavior of lithium-ion batteries exposed to thermal excursion is of great interest to plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) applications, because vehicles often endure wide weather conditions in operation. Here we investigate a composite {LixMn(2)O(4) + LixNi(1/3)Mn(1/3)Co(1/3)O(2)}-based commercial cell design to assess performance and degradation under thermal excursion from 25 degrees C; through -20 degrees C, -5 degrees C, 10 degrees C, 25 degrees C, 40 degrees C, and 60 degrees C; to 25 degrees C. In each isothermal regime, a reference performance test with charge and discharge cycles at C/25, C/5, C/2, 1C, and 2C is conducted to quantify cell capacity, rate capability, and other performance variations. The capacity fade caused by the thermal excursion is attributed to origins including loss of active material, degradation in reaction kinetics, and the ohmic resistance increases. Using electrochemical inference techniques, we found that thermal excursion in the range of -5 degrees C to 40 degrees C is benign to capacity fade. Exposure to -20 degrees C and 60 degrees C respectively leads to irreversible fade. The capacity fade at -20 degrees C induced Li inventory loss and did not cause kinetic degradation, whereas the exposure at 60 degrees C resulted in degradation in reaction kinetics. The evaluation protocols and results are helpful in assisting the study of path dependence of cell degradation in thermal aging. (C) 2012 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI:10.1149/2.063301jes] All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据