4.6 Article

Finite-Element Modeling of Idealized Infiltrated Composite Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 156, 期 4, 页码 B458-B464

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.3076133

关键词

barium compounds; cathodes; cobalt compounds; diffusion; finite element analysis; ionic conductivity; lanthanum compounds; mixed conductivity; nanocomposites; solid oxide fuel cells; strontium compounds

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER46255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The polarization resistance of idealized, branched, composite cathodes was modeled using a two-dimensional finite element calculation. The model structures consisted of micrometer-scale columns and nanoscale branches of ionically conducting materials that were coated with a mixed-conducting material. The structures approximate an ionic-conductor matrix infiltrated first with the same ionic-conductor material and then with a mixed conductor. Increasing the length of the ionically conducting nanobranches, and hence, the surface area of the infiltrated mixed conductor, resulted in a factor of similar to 10 polarization resistance decrease compared to mixed-conductor-coated columns without ionically conducting nanobranches. For many solid oxide fuel cell relevant temperatures (500-900 degrees C), cathode geometries, and materials, the cathode resistance was limited by surface oxygen exchange and hence, was inversely proportional to the mixed-conductor surface area. However, for cathode columns or branches with large enough aspect ratios, ionic-conduction losses also limited the polarization resistance. The characteristic length of nanostructured cathodes was found to depend on the cathode surface area ratio in addition to the traditional bulk diffusion constant to surface exchange constant ratio (D/k). Lastly, the effects of materials properties, particularly ionic conductivity and surface resistance, were investigated and discussed for common cathode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据