4.3 Article

Finding a Facile Method to Synthesize Decahedral Silver Nanoparticles through a Systematic Study of Temperature Effect on Photomediated Silver Nanostructure Growth

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 3A, 页码 325-331

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.201000048

关键词

Temperature; Silver nanoprism colloid, Decahedral silver nanoparticles; SPR

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of Taiwan [NSC 96-2113-M-415-007-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To the best of our knowledge, few reports have been concerned with the effect of temperature on photomediated silver nanostructure growth In this work, the shape evolution from spherical silver nanoparticles to silver nanoprisms and nanostructures in other shapes under the irradiation of a sodium lamp (lambda(max) = 589 nm, 0.66 W/cm(2)) at various temperatures (i.e, 15, 40, 60, and 80 degrees C) were studied by recording the TEM images and time-course UV-vis-NIR spectra of the silver colloids. From TEM and spectra analysis, it was found that the photomediated silver nanoparticle shape conversion process would be faster at a higher temperature, i.e., ca 2 hours at 80 degrees C, and slower at a lower temperature, i.e., ca. 17 hours at 15 degrees C. The silver nanoplates synthesized at a higher temperature had a narrower size distribution and were thicker than those synthesized at a lower temperature. Some decahedral silver nanoparticles, about 10% of the final irradiation products, were observed in the synthesis (with a sodium lamp) at 15 degrees C In order to produce a higher yield of decahedral silver nanoparticles, the sodium lamp was replaced with blue LEDs (lambda(max) = 450 nm), which have a wavelength closer to the SPR of decahedral silver NPs (ca. 490 nm). The decahedral silver nanoparticles with a fairly narrow size distribution were obtained by irradiating the spherical nanoparticle colloids with the blue LEDs at 2 degrees C in the absence of PVP or other large-molecular-mass surfactants

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据